11.2.24 Dairyland Sentinel

  • In January, the Senate Committee on Sporting Heritage conducted a session to review a DNR rule regarding gray wolf hunting limits. Concerns surfaced over territorial zones, quotas, tagging, and unclear stipulations for property owners. The Committee decided to push for changes, with the DNR consenting to revisit the regulations. However, with no Secretary in office, these discussions have yet to progress.
  • April saw Governor Evers veto legislation that would have allocated $125 million for new DNR initiatives aimed at aiding communities impacted by PFAS. The bill had undergone significant modifications based on requests from the DNR under the previous Secretary’s guidance. Governor Evers’ veto, five months post-Payne’s resignation, raises questions about whether he was aware of these negotiations or the DNR’s incorporated requests, Stafsholt argues.
  • In June, legal action was initiated against the DNR by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL), challenging an administrative rule that not only extended beyond fishery regulations but also impinged on the Second Amendment rights of citizens. Following the lawsuit, the DNR pledged in court to initiate the rule’s repeal promptly. Had there been a Secretary Stafsholt believes, this issue might have been resolved through negotiation rather than legal confrontation, sparing public funds.
  • By July, the DNR unexpectedly terminated its trout stocking collaboration with local clubs across Wisconsin, citing inability to afford fish transportation despite having raised them since November. Clubs had already completed necessary preparations. It later emerged that the DNR had indeed transported the fish but released them into a nearby river, bypassing the clubs. Senator Stafsholt thinks this incident starkly illustrates the impact of absent leadership on established conservation programs at the DNR.

Emailed. Free. Wisconsin News and Analysis.

Free!